this-video-has-the-potential

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Question 1 After reading “Paul’s Case” and the notes on literary elements,
which elements do you think stand out most in the short story? What do
you think is the story’s predominant theme? How do you see this theme
supported with literary elements, such as symbols, setting, etc.?
Remember there is no right answer. Your opinions will hopefully prompt discussions
from your classmates. ( Around 200 words
)

You got to read and watch the links and analysis
info below .

1. .shsu.edu/~eng_wpf/authors/Cather/Pauls-Case.htm”>http://www.shsu.edu/~eng_wpf/authors/Cather/Pauls-Case.htm

2. This video has the potential to be 75 minutes long.
However, when you click on the link, you’ll see that it is broken down into
segments. View the brief video called “.mc3.edu/webapps/blackboard/execute/displayLearningUnit?course_id=_100117_1&content_id=_3358728_1″>Components of Critical Thinking: Analysis and
Synthesis (03:25).”

.films.com/play/WMAU25″>http://digital.films.com/play/WMAU25#

3. Literary Analysis – The
writing process for a literary/film analysis is similar to any other writing
assignment. However, we could liken analysis most closely to argument. You will
be arguing your interpretation of the text and film. As a result, there are a
number of common elements between analysis and argument. Generally, I consider
analysis as a three step process: claims, evidence, and reasoning. After
developing a solid thesis that combines theme with element, the writer is
responsible for offering numerous subclaims to support the thesis. These
subclaims are then supported with evidence from the text and/or film, whether
in the form of paraphrase or quotes. Additionally, this evidence must be
reasoned. In other words, you must make clear connections between the subclaim
and the evidence you have chosen from the text. You must tell the reader how
the specific evidence has allowed you to draw the conclusions that have led to your
unique interpretations. The attached document reviews, though rather generally,
the process of writing a literary analysis.

Note the difference between critical comments and plot points. A
critical comment uses analysis to explore a conclusion you’ve drawn on your
own, whereas a plot point merely summarizes or restates material evident from
the text. One of the most common errors on a first draft is the tendency
to unnecessarily summarize. As a result, the writer never gets down to the
nitty gritty of analysis. Plot points are simply elements that actually exist
in the text/film. Your job is to take plot points and turn them into something
larger. Take these plot points and what you know to be true from your own
experiences and tell the reader something that he/she doesn’t already know from
reading the text. In other words, offer and defend original interpretations of
your own.

When writing your actual
essay, consider the following as a basic outline for your five paragraph
minimum essay:

The introduction
should begin creatively and should offer essential background info that
prepares the reader for the upcoming thesis. The intro should include the
author and title of the story in addition to explanation of the theme to be
discussed. In most cases, the thesis concludes the introduction, leading the
reader into the body of the essay.

The body of the essay is the supporting paragraphs that follow
the thesis. Each body paragraph should have three essential elements: topic
sentence/subclaim, evidence, and reasoning/commentary. The topic sentence is
usually the first sentence of the paragraph and it relates directly back to the
thesis. Generally, the topic sentence is a subclaim of the thesis, offering a
primary reason for the thesis to be true. The evidence that follows supports
the topic sentence. This evidence is usually a concrete detail or specific
example from the work itself, often taking form as a paraphrase or direct
quote. Often more than one concrete detail is necessary to persuade the reader
of each individual claim. Offering evidence is not enough. Your evidence should
always be reasoned with explanation or interpretation of your concrete detail.
This commentary tells the reader what the author means or how the concrete
detail relates to the subclaim or thesis. The reasoning is the meat of your
essay, offering the actual analysis and interpretation. You should have twice
as much commentary as you have concrete details. Ideally, you would offer a
concluding sentence or two to close the paragraph.

When concluding your essay, you want to echo your thesis without repeating it
word for word. The conclusion should be adequately developed to
reflect the depth of your essay. Your conclusion could reflect on how your
thesis relates back to the story as a whole. Also, it could give a personal
statement about the topic or offer an opinion of the story’s overall value.

Question 2 –As we said, Paul’s
Case
, is a literal translation of the story, meaning that
it reproduces the story’s plot and details as closely as possible.
Nonetheless, the film does have its differences from the story. What
differences did you note between the film and story? Try to list at least
three. Do these changes influence your interpretation of theme?
Why? ( Around 200 words ) This one is connected with first question

You got to read and watch
the links below.

1.
Watch Paul’s
Case
(1980) directed by
Lamont Johnson ( Id and Password – montgomery )

.films.com/PortalViewVideo.aspx?xtid=44833&psid=0&sid=0&State=&title=Willa%20Cathers%20Pauls%20Case&IsSearch=Y&parentSeriesID”>http://digital.films.com/PortalViewVideo.aspx?xtid=44833&psid=0&sid=0&State=&title=Willa%20Cathers%20Pauls%20Case&IsSearch=Y&parentSeriesID=

More to explorer

Answer:

Title: this-video-has-the-potential

This question has been Solved!

Click the button below to order this solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open chat