what-would-you-do-differently-in-the-future

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

(Benchmark Assignment)
Spiritual Needs Assessment

This assignment requires
you to interview one person and requires an analysis of your interview
experience.

Part I: Interview

Select a patient, a
family member, or a friend to interview. Be sure to focus on the interviewee’s
experience as a patient, regardless of whom you choose to interview.

Review The Joint
Commission resource which provides some guidelines for creating spiritual
assessment tools for evaluating the spiritual needs of patients. Using this
resource and any other guidelines/examples that you can find, create your own
tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients.

Create a survey to assess
the subject’s spiritual need during the interview. The spiritual needs
assessment survey needs a minimum of five questions that can be answered during
the interview. During the interview, document the interviewee’s
responses.

Submit the transcript of
the interview. The transcript should include the questions asked and the
answers provided. Be sure record the responses during the interview by
taking detailed notes. Omit specific names and other personal information from
the interview.

Part II: Analysis

Write a 250-500 word
analysis of your interview experience. Be sure to exclude specific names and other
personal information from the interview. Instead provide demographics such as
sex, age, ethnicity, and religion. Include the following in your response:

  1. What
    went well?
  2. What
    would you do differently in the future?
  3. Were
    there any barriers or challenges that inhibited your ability to complete
    the assessment tool? How would you address these in the future or change
    your assessment to better address these challenges?
  4. Describe
    the spiritual experience you had with your patient, family member, or
    friend using this tool. How does this tool allow you to better meet the
    needs of your patient?
  5. Did
    you discover that illness and stress amplified the spiritual concern and
    needs of your interviewee? Explain your answer with examples.

Submit both the
transcript of the interview and the analysis of your results.

Prepare this assignment
according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the
Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a
rubric (see enclosed). Please review
the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.

You are required to
submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the
Student

Success Center.

Rubric enclosed:

(Benchmark Assignment) Spiritual Needs Assessment

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%

3
Satisfactory
75.00%

4
Good
85.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

40.0 %Tool for Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients

Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is not
present.

Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present
but lacks focus on experiences of patients.

Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present
and focuses on experiences of patients.

Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present
and focuses on experiences of patient. The tool uses reliable methods for
gathering data.

Tool for assessing the spiritual needs of patients is present
and focuses on experiences of patients. The tool uses effective methods for
gathering data that produces the results intended.

30.0 %Analysis of Interview Experience

An analysis of the interview experience is not included.

An analysis of the interview experience is included but addresses
a few of the points included in the assignment instructions.

An analysis of the interview experience is included and
addresses most of the points included in the assignment instructions.

An analysis of the interview experience is included and addresses
all of the points included in the assignment instructions.

An analysis of the interview experience is included and
addresses all of the points included in the assignment instructions. The
analysis shows a deep understanding of the connections.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments
and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the
paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of
the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses
noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have
questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but
not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction
and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from
introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a
distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar,
language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication
of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and
figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and
direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper.
Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

More to explorer

Change Management Presentation

Purpose of AssessmentDevelop specific strategies with supporting tactics to implement positive change within an organization. You may refer to the information that you

Driver Safety

 You were recently hired as the fleet safety manager of a company that operates a fleet of 25 delivery trucks within a

Answer:

Title: what-would-you-do-differently-in-the-future

This question has been Solved!

Click the button below to order this solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Open chat